Comments on Ralph Wedgwood’s The Nature of Normativity

Philosophical Studies 151 (3):449-457 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ralph Wedgwood has written a big book: not in terms of pages (though there are plenty) but in terms of scope and ambition. Scope, in that he addresses many of the central issues around normativity, providing an account of the semantics of ‘ought’, and then a metaphysics and an epistemology to go with it; ambition in that so much of this is novel. Along the way there are myriad discussion of relevant philosophical background issues and of methodology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Normativity: Précis.Ralph Wedgwood - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (3):445 - 448.
Thinking about Normativity: Ralph Wedgwood on 'Ought'.Wim de Muijnck - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):133-144.
A slim semantics for thin moral terms?Laura Schroeter & Francois Schroeter - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):191 – 207.
Review of Ralph Wedgwood, The Nature of Normativity[REVIEW]Mark Shroeder - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (3).
Review: Reply to Ralph Wedgwood. [REVIEW]Peter Railton - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (3):501 - 508.
Comments on Boghossian.John Broome - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (1):19-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-07

Downloads
108 (#202,799)

6 months
10 (#281,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Holton
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Toxin Puzzle.Gregory S. Kavka - 1983 - Analysis 43 (1):33-36.

Add more references