The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation

Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7):489-492 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we outline and defend the concept of voluntary non-directed postmortem sperm donation. This approach offers a potential means of increasing the quantity and heterogeneity of donor sperm. This is pertinent given the present context of a donor sperm shortage in the UK. Beyond making the case that it is technically feasible for dead men to donate their sperm for use in reproduction, we argue that this is ethically permissible. The inability to access donor sperm and the suffering this causes, we argue, justifies allowing access to sperm donated after death. Moreover, it is known that individuals and couples have desires for certain sperm donor characteristics which may not be fulfilled when numbers of sperm donors are low. Enacting these preferences contributes significantly to the well-being of intended parents, so we argue that this provides apro tantoreason for respecting them. Finally, we explore the benefits and possible disadvantages of such a system for the various parties affected.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-directed postmortem sperm donation: some questions.Frederick Kroon & Ben Kroon - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (4):261-262.
Balancing rules in postmortem sperm donation.Guido Pennings - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (4):270-271.
Woman wants dead fiance's baby: who owns a dead man's sperm.M. Spriggs - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):384-388.
Sperm Donation and the Right to Privacy.Oliver Hallich - 2017 - The New Bioethics 23 (2):107-120.
The moral complexity of sperm donation.Rivka Weinberg - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (3):166–178.
Anonymous Sperm Donation.Shari Collins & Eric Comerford - 2012 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):213-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-30

Downloads
38 (#648,670)

6 months
14 (#221,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Parker
Lancaster University

Citations of this work

The complex case of Ellie Anderson.Joona Räsänen & Anna Smajdor - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (4):217-221.
Non-directed postmortem sperm donation: some questions.Frederick Kroon & Ben Kroon - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (4):261-262.
Balancing rules in postmortem sperm donation.Guido Pennings - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (4):270-271.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Shaping future children: Parental rights and societal interests.Dan W. Brock - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (4):377–398.
Ethical Problems with Ethnic Matching in Gamete Donation.Hane Htut Maung - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):112-116.

Add more references