Remark on Al-Fārābī's missing modal logic and its effect on Ibn Sīnā

Eshare: An Iranian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):39-73 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We reconstruct as much as we can the part of al-Fārābī's treatment of modal logic that is missing from the surviving pages of his Long Commentary on the Prior Analytics. We use as a basis the quotations from this work in Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Rushd and Maimonides, together with relevant material from al-Fārābī's other writings. We present a case that al-Fārābī's treatment of the dictum de omni had a decisive effect on the development and presentation of Ibn Sīnā's modal logic. We give further evidence that the Harmonisation of the Opinions of Plato and Aristotle was not written by al-Fārābī.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ibn Sina’s Anticipation of Burdian and Barcan Formulas.Zia Movahed - 2006 - In Logic in Tehran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 248-255.
The Islamic Contribution to Medieval Philosophical Theology.David Burrell - 1997 - In Charles Taliaferro & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 99–105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-09

Downloads
560 (#47,966)

6 months
114 (#48,191)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wilfrid Hodges
British Academy

Citations of this work

How did Avicenna understand the Barcan formulas?Wilfrid Hodges - 2023 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 31 (6):1170-1191.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references