Finite h-dimension does not imply expressive completeness

Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (5):535 - 573 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A conjecture of Gabbay (1981) states that any class of flows of time having the property known as finite H-dimension admits a finite set of expressively complete one-dimensional temporal connectives. Here we show that the class of 'circular' structures refutes the generalisation of this conjecture to Kripke frames. We then construct from this class, by a general method, a new class of irreflexive transitive flows of time that refutes the original conjecture. Our paper includes full descriptions of a method for establishing finite H-dimension for a class of structures and of the technique for extending finite H-dimension to other classes, and an introduction surveying the area of expressive completeness

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#311,949)

6 months
20 (#148,864)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Axiomatisation and decidability off andp in cyclical time.Mark Reynolds - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (2):197 - 224.
The k-variable property is stronger than h-dimension K.Ian Hodkinson & András Simon - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):81-101.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Past, present and future.Arthur N. Prior - 1967 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Time and modality.Arthur N. Prior - 1957 - London: Oxford University Press.
Past, present, and future.Arthur Prior - 1967 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 157:476-476.
[Omnibus Review].H. Jerome Keisler - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (2):342-344.
Expressiveness and completeness of an interval tense logic.Yde Venema - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (4):529-547.

View all 9 references / Add more references