Self-deception and confabulation

Philosophy of Science 67 (3):S418-S429 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cases in which people are self-deceived seem to require that the person hold two contradictory beliefs, something which appears to be impossible or implausible. A phenomenon seen in some brain-damaged patients known as confabulation (roughly, an ongoing tendency to make false utterances without intent to deceive) can shed light on the problem of self-deception. The conflict is not actually between two beliefs, but between two representations, a 'conceptual' one and an 'analog' one. In addition, confabulation yields valuable clues about the structure of normal human knowledge-gathering processes. [The hypothesis defended here is significantly altered and greatly expanded in my book Brain Fiction.]

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Self-Knowledge and Its Limits.John Schwenkler - 2018 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (1):85-95.
Have I unmasked self-deception or am I self-deceived?Alfred R. Mele - 2009 - In Clancy W. Martin (ed.), The philosophy of deception. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 260.
Confabulation and rational obligations for self-knowledge.Sophie Keeling - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (8):1215-1238.
Have I Unmasked Self-Deception or Am I Self-Deceived?Alfred R. Mele - 2009 - In Clancy W. Martin (ed.), The philosophy of deception. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 260.
What is the role of the self in self-deception?Richard Holton - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):53-69.
Self-deception and self-knowledge.Jordi Fernández - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):379-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,414 (#11,789)

6 months
164 (#24,087)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile