Activation/organization, masculinization/feminization: What are they and how are they distinguished?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):332-333 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The activational and organizational hormone effects as originally defined do not conflict with activational influences on brain structure. Ovarian hormonal influences on the rodent corpus callosum could be activational rather than organizational. The masculinization/feminization distinction in brain structure and the timing of sex differences in visuo-spatial abilities need to be clarified.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Default is not in the female, but in the theory.Roslyn Holly Fitch & Victor H. Denenberg - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):341-346.
The corpus callosum: More than a passive “corpus”.Kenneth Hugdahl - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):335-335.
Ovarian influences on female development: Revolutionary or evolutionary?Kim Wallen - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):339-340.
Estrogens in human psychosexual differentiation.Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):336-337.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#834,437)

6 months
10 (#430,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references