Comment on Tapley's "What is Wrong With Being a Pervert?"

Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (2):51-56 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Comment on Robin Tapley's paper on whether or not the sexual aspect of sexual harms adds anything to the harm done. I argue it does not based on the grounds Tapley provides.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview200925234

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sexual Fantasy and the Eroticization of Evil.Richard Kimberly Heck - manuscript
Kant and Sexual Perversion.Alan Soble - 2003 - The Monist 86 (1):55-89.
Transvestitism and Perversion.Bogdan Zadorozhny - 2016
Sexual Perversion and Human Nature.James M. Humber - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:331-350.
Harming the dead, once again.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1985 - Ethics 96 (1):162-164.
"Next Time" Means "No": Sexual Consent and the Structure of Refusals.Ginger Tate Clausen - 2020 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 6 (4).
Conceptually situating the harm of rape: An analysis of objectification.Lindsay Kelland - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):168-183.
Two accounts of laws and time.Barry Loewer - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (1):115-137.
What is Wrong with Being a Pervert.Robin Tapley - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):173-179.
What is Wrong with Being a Pervert.David L. Hildebrand - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):173-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
965 (#22,489)

6 months
132 (#38,318)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David L. Hildebrand
University of Colorado Denver

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references