Argument against Ethicists' Testimony Logically Flawed

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4_suppl):4-5 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Courts Rule against Admissibility of Testimony.Giles R. Scofield - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4_suppl):5-5.
Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics.G. J. Agich & B. J. Spielman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):381-403.
Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testimony.Françoise Baylis - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):240-242.
The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in The Courtroom.Taiwo A. Oriola - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 6:1-25.
An argument against research on people with intellectual disabilities.S. D. Edwards - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (1):69-73.
In Defence of Ethicists. A Commentary on Christopher Cowley’s Paper.Jan Crosthwaite - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (3):281-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
44 (#508,392)

6 months
7 (#722,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references