Russell's Revenge: A Problem for Bivalent Fregean Theories of Descriptions

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (4):636-652 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fregean theories of descriptions as terms have to deal with improper descriptions. To save bivalence various proposals have been made that involve assigning referents to improper descriptions. While bivalence is indeed saved, there is a price to be paid. Instantiations of the same general scheme, viz. the one and only individual that is F and G is G, are not only allowed but even required to have different truth values.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-09

Downloads
628 (#42,521)

6 months
112 (#52,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Heylen
KU Leuven

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
On referring.Peter F. Strawson - 1950 - Mind 59 (235):320-344.
Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Descriptions.Stephen Neale - 1990 - MIT Press.

View all 44 references / Add more references