Nach der Postmoderne?

Phänomenologische Forschungen 2006:135-157 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modernity has survived postmodernism. ‚Postmodernism‘ as a term has ceased to be modern. Is this justified? My thesis is that we still remain in postmodernism and at the same time have left it behind: While it has been dismissed as a positive idea, its irritating diagnosis of a pluralization of world, text and, particulary, speaking subject preserves its value. From a phenomenological point of view, Roland Barthes’ insistence on the individual body of the writer and reader can be understood as a reaction to the postmodern de-personalized concept of texts – as a challenge to speak with one’s own voice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz nach der Postmoderne.Volker Peckhaus - 2009 - In Erich Barke, Rolf Wernstedt & Herbert Breger (eds.), Leibniz neu denken. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.
On the Postmodern Age.Martina Sauer (ed.) - 2020 - New York & São Paulo: Art Style.
Postmodernism, or an Abuse of Concepts.Van Dan Nguyen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:169-189.
Semiotics and the Spectacle of Transformation in Copyright Law.David Tan - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (4):593-623.
Differences that matter: feminist theory and postmodernism.Sara Ahmed - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-13

Downloads
3 (#1,852,803)

6 months
3 (#1,477,354)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references