- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The overdetermination argument against eliminativism
Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (1):113-119 (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Response to Hermes's The Overdetermination Argument against Eliminativism.Richard Cole - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (2):107-109.
Eliminativism, interventionism and the Overdetermination Argument.Eric Yang - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):321-340.
Ordinary Objects and the Overdetermination Argument.Martin Orensanz - 2022 - Cosmos and History 18 (2):445-456.
An unstable eliminativism.John W. Carroll & William R. Carter - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):1–17.
Surviving Eliminativism.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - In Objects and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pluralism, causation, and overdetermination.Brian Jonathan Garrett - 1998 - Synthese 116 (3):355-78.
Arguing for eliminativism. Berm - 2005 - In Brian L. Keeley (ed.), Paul Churchland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
100 (#210,044)
6 months
15 (#198,278)
2009-01-28
Downloads
100 (#210,044)
6 months
15 (#198,278)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-d9z9s uwo