Confucian Family for a Feminist Future

Asian Philosophy 22 (4):327-346 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Confucian family, not only in its historical manifestations but also in the imagination of the Confucian founders, was the locus of misogynist norms and practices that have subjugated women in varying degrees. Therefore, advancing women’s well-being and equality in East Asia may seem to require radically transforming the Confucian family to approximate alternative ideal conceptions of the family in the West. This article opposes such a stance by arguing that (1) Western conceptions of the family may be neither plausible nor feasible in traditionally Confucian societies and (2) the Confucian family, once reconstructed in line with Confucianism’s core ideas and values, can be conducive to a feminist future in East Asia that is uniquely Confucian. In order to support my position, not only influential contemporary Western ideal conceptions of the family from the justice perspective and care ethics, but also different interpretations of the Confucian family will be carefully examined.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Confucianism and acceptable inequalities.Sungmoon Kim - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (10):0191453713507015.
Which Confucianism? And What Liberty?Ruiping Fan - 2021 - In Robert A. Carleo & Yong Huang (eds.), Confucian Political Philosophy: Dialogues on the State of the Field. Springer Verlag. pp. 89-99.
Political implications of confucian familism.Antonio Rappa & Sor-Hoon Tan - 2003 - Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):87 – 102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-09

Downloads
1,365 (#12,384)

6 months
344 (#5,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ranjoo S. Herr
Bentley College

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
A theory of justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.

View all 37 references / Add more references