An Ethical Obligation for Bioethicists to Utilize Social Media

Hastings Center Report 49 (1):39-40 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this issue of the Hastings Center Report, Mélanie Terrasse, Moti Gorin, and Dominic Sisti respond to recent efforts to address the “digital attention crisis,” arguing that “[b]ioethicists should make their voices heard in the debate on the responsibilities of social media companies toward their consumers and society at large.” I strongly agree. I have frequently been asked by my colleagues why I spend time on social media professionally, on top of all the competing demands associated with my work as a bioethicist and medical educator. There is sometimes a dismissive tone in these questions, a sense that attention to social media is beneath a bioethicist’s proper intellectual pursuits. Such perspectives overlook the extraordinary opportunities of social media and the important role for bioethics, as a field, in examining them.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Welcoming the “Intel‐ethicist”.John Banja - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (1):33-36.
Bioethics and the Rituals of Media.Peter Simonson - 2002 - Hastings Center Report 32 (1):32-39.
Looking for experts.Susan Gilbert - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (5):inside front cover-inside front.
Thinking social media from ethical viewpoint.Joji Nakaya - 2015 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):1-13.
No Time for an AIDS Backlash.Timothy F. Murphy - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (2):7-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-22

Downloads
10 (#1,462,317)

6 months
3 (#1,467,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references