Demons and the Isolation Argument

Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):403–418 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Justifying a belief gives reason to think that the belief is true. So our concept of justification contains a ‘truth connection’. I canvass a number of proposals for analysing this. In the end, two competing conceptions of the truth connection remain: the first, that justifying a belief makes the belief objectively probable, the second, that justifying a belief makes the belief probable in a world which would make true our other beliefs. I discuss reasons for embracing and rejecting these two versions of the truth connection. Ultimately, the two versions appear to represent distinct but equally plausible conceptions of justification. I conclude by rejecting the proposal that these truth connections respectively capture internalist and externalist conceptions of justification.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#406,689)

6 months
5 (#1,091,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justification and truth.Stewart Cohen - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 46 (3):279--95.
An internalist externalism.William P. Alston - 1988 - Synthese 74 (3):265 - 283.
Why knowledge is merely true belief.Crispin Sartwell - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):167-180.
Theories of justification.Richard Fumerton - 2002 - In Paul K. Moser (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. New York: Oup Usa. pp. 204--233.

View all 6 references / Add more references