Lexical and Conceptual Arguments and Historical Reading: on the History of SELF

Paragraph 37 (1):126-142 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The terms ‘self’ and ‘moi’ appeared within the lexica of French and English at the end of the sixteenth century, for example in Shakespeare's The Comedy of Errors. This paper takes a sceptical approach to lexical arguments about the history of the self and SELF-concepts. Initially, the relationship of SELF to the question of ‘paradigms’ and ‘conceptual schemes’ is discussed via recent work in developmental psychology and classic discussions within analytic philosophy. The questions raised in the theoretical discussion are then re-examined through short readings of texts that do not contain lexicalized SELF-vocabulary, by the sixteenth-century French writers Maurice Scève and Michel de Montaigne. It is suggested that the importance of lexical arguments to the history of selves and SELF-concepts has been exaggerated, and that cognitive study has the potential to transform the study of the first-person stance and its history.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-20

Downloads
15 (#1,246,497)

6 months
8 (#622,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Helgeson
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references