A Modern Myth. That Letting Die is not the Intentional Causation of Death: some reflections on the trial and acquittal of Dr Leonard Arthur

Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):21-38 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT If a doctor kills a severely handicapped infant, he commits an act of murder; if he deliberately allows such an infant to die, he is said to engage in the proper practice of medicine. This is the view that emerged at the recent trial of Dr Leonard Arthur over the death of the infant John Pearson. However, the distinction between murder on the one hand and what are regarded as permissible lettings die on the other rests on the Moral Difference Myth, according to which deliberate lettings die in the practice of medicine are not instances of the intentional causation of death. I argue that a doctor who refrains from preventing a handicapped infant's death, causes that infant's death and does so intentionally. He commits an act of murder. But, I suggest, not all instances of the intentional causation of death are morally wrong. To the extent that they are not, killing rather than letting die will often be the preferable option because more economical of suffering. Hence what is required is the abolition of the Moral Difference Myth and legislation to the effect that those doctors who justifiably cause a patient's death—whether by an action or by an omission—commit no offence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A modern myth: that letting die is not the intentional causation of death.Helga Kuhse - 1999 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 315--328.
An Irrelevant Consideration: Killing Versus Letting Die.Michael Tooley - 1994 - In Bonnie Steinbock & Alastair Norcross (eds.), Killing and Letting Die. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 56–62.
Causation and Moral Responsibility for Death.William E. Stempsey - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 4:171-176.
Death by non-feeding: Not in the baby's best interests.Helga Kuhse - 1986 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 7 (2):79-90.
Death is Not Always the Greatest Evil: Killing and Letting Die in Bioethics.James Green - 2002 - Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada)
Killing and Letting Die.Matthew Hanser - 1993 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Two Ways to Kill a Patient.Ben Bronner - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (1):44-63.
The Philosophy of Death.Steven Luper - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
65 (#332,650)

6 months
7 (#676,990)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?