- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
So Many Are “Few,” but so Few Are Also “Few” – Reduced Semantic Flexibility in bvFTD Patients
Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
If so many are “few,” how few are “many”?Stefan Heim, Corey T. McMillan, Robin Clark, Stephanie Golob, Nam E. Min, Christopher Olm, John Powers & Murray Grossman - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
“Few” or “Many”? An Adaptation Level Theory Account for Flexibility in Quantifier Processing.Stefan Heim, Natalja Peiseler & Natalia Bekemeier - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Proportional readings of many and few: the case for an underspecified measure function.Alan Bale & Bernhard Schwarz - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (6):673-699.
Extensionality in natural language quantification: the case of many and few.Kristen A. Greer - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (4):315-351.
Why have there been so few women philosophers.Gerda Lerner - 2000 - In Cecile Thérèse Tougas & Sara Ebenreck (eds.), Presenting women philosophers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 5--14.
From Freedom From to Freedom To: New Perspectives on Intentional Action.Sofia Bonicalzi & Patrick Haggard - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10:459073.
History of the Law of Nations A few remarks apropos of some recent and not so recent publications.Cornelis G. Roelofsen - 1993 - Grotiana 14 (1):52-58.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-04-03
Downloads
20 (#1,035,722)
6 months
6 (#851,135)
2020-04-03
Downloads
20 (#1,035,722)
6 months
6 (#851,135)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference.Harry Helson - 1948 - Psychological Review 55 (6):297-313.
Is it logical to count on quantifiers? Dissociable neural networks underlying numerical and logical quantifiers.V. Troiani, J. Peelle, R. Clark & M. Grossman - 2009 - Neuropsychologia 47 (1):104--111.
Neural basis for generalized quantifiers comprehension.C. T. Mcmillan, R. Clark, P. Moore, C. Devita & M. Grossman - 2005 - Neuropsychologia 43:1729--1737.
The processing of polar quantifiers, and numerosity perception.Isabelle Deschamps, Galit Agmon, Yonatan Loewenstein & Yosef Grodzinsky - 2015 - Cognition 143 (C):115-128.
Probing the mental representation of quantifiers.Sandro Pezzelle, Raffaella Bernardi & Manuela Piazza - 2018 - Cognition 181 (C):117-126.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-kkgnk uwo