Hypotheses and Conventions in Poincaré

In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter. pp. 169-192 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vaihinger and Poincaré: An Original Pragmatism?Christophe Bouriau - 2009 - In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter. pp. 221-250.
The Hypothesis of Reality and the Reality of Hypotheses.Alfred Nordmann - 2009 - In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter. pp. 313-340.
Experience and Hypotheses: Opinions within Locke’s Realm.Rainer Specht - 2009 - In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter. pp. 39-58.
Introduction.Gregor Schiemann & M. Heidelberger - 2009 - In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
9 (#1,515,182)

6 months
3 (#1,465,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Poincaré’s Classification of Hypotheses and Their Role in Natural Science.María de Paz - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):369-382.
The Methods Behind Poincaré’s Conventions: Structuralism and Hypothetical-Deductivism.María de Paz - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (1):169-188.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references