- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Gibsonian sins of omission
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):307–311 (1981)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Incommensurability and the "omission" in Gibson's theory: A second reply to Heil.Harry Heft - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (3):345–347.
Gibsonian theory and the pragmatist perspective.Wiliam G. Noble - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (1):65–85.
Towards the improvement of Gibsonian perception theory.Thomas Natsoulas - 1984 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14 (2):231–258.
What Heil is missing in Gibson: A reply.Harry Heft - 1980 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 10 (3):187–193.
Perception and cognition: A final reply to Heil.Edward S. Reed & Rebecca K. Jones - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (2):223–224.
What Gibson isn't missing after all: A reply to Heil.Stephen Wilcox & Stuart Katz - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):313–317.
Responsibility and Choice in Robert Nozick: Sins of Commission and of Omission.Emily R. Gill - 1978 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 59 (4):344.
Sins of omission are more likely to be forgiven in non-native speakers.Sarah Fairchild & Anna Papafragou - 2018 - Cognition 181 (C):80-92.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
34 (#676,652)
6 months
6 (#913,443)
2009-01-28
Downloads
34 (#676,652)
6 months
6 (#913,443)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
James J. Gibson's revolution in perceptual psychology: A case study of the transformation of scientific ideas.Edward S. Reed - 1986 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (1):65-98.
The ecological perception debate: An affordance of the journal for the theory of social behaviour.G. P. Ginsburg - 1990 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (4):347–364.
Perception and cognition: A final reply to Heil.Edward S. Reed & Rebecca K. Jones - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (2):223–224.
The ecological approach to social perception: A conceptual critique.Bernd H. Schmitt - 1987 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17 (3):265–278.
Incommensurability and the "omission" in Gibson's theory: A second reply to Heil.Harry Heft - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (3):345–347.
References found in this work
The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems.James Jerome Gibson - 1966 - Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson's theory of perception: A case of hasty epistemologizing?Edward S. Reed & Rebecca K. Jones - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):519-530.
The concept of information in Gibson' S theory of perception.D. W. Hamlyn - 1977 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 7 (1):5–16.
Gibson' S ecological optics: Consequences of a different stimulus description.Ulric Neisser - 1977 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 7 (1):17–28.
Is perception blind?Edward S. Reed & Rebecca K. Jones - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (1):87–91.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-72rpk uwo