Shifting roles, enduring values: The credible journalist in a digital age

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (4):262 – 279 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When everyone can be a publisher, what distinguishes the journalist? This article considers contemporary challenges to institutional roles in a digital media environment and then turns to three broad journalistic normative values - authenticity, accountability, and autonomy - that affect the credibility of journalists and the content they provide. A set of questions that can help citizens determine the trustworthiness of information available to them emerges from the discussion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#231,750)

6 months
15 (#197,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

33. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life.Sissela Bok - 2014 - In Bernard Williams (ed.), Essays and Reviews: 1959-2002. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 161-165.
The elements of journalism: what newspeople should know and the public should expect.Bill Kovach - 2014 - New York: Three Rivers Press. Edited by Tom Rosenstiel.
Philosophical foundations for global journalism ethics.Stephen J. A. Ward - 2005 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):3 – 21.
Existential objectivity: Freeing journalists to be ethical.Kevin Stoker - 1995 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (1):5 – 22.

View all 8 references / Add more references