Farewell to Teleology: Reflections on Camus and a Rebellious Cosmopolitanism without Hope

Critical Horizons 17 (1):79-93 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper reconstructs Albert Camus's notion of the absurd in order to elucidate his critique of historical teleology. In his life and work, Camus endeavoured to develop a fallibilist historical sensibility suitable for a cosmos shorn of meaning, which led him to reject ideas of progress and their traces of messianism when elaborating his treatment of rebellion. By making use of Camus's ideas about the absurd and rebellion, I suggest that these two themes productively unsettle contemporary cosmopolitanism as a teleological orthodoxy of human progress and fruitfully, if paradoxically, lie at the heart of a concept of cosmopolitanism “without hope.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Albert Camus and Rebellious Cosmopolitanism in a Divided Worlda.Patrick Hayden - 2013 - Journal of International Political Theory 9 (2):194-219.
Albert Camus-A Fighter in an Absurd World.Pauline Hong - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (3):57-75.
The Absurd.David Sherman - 2008-10-10 - In Steven Nadler (ed.), Camus. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 21–55.
Exile and Rebirth.David Sherman - 2008-10-10 - In Steven Nadler (ed.), Camus. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 194–206.
Albert Camus as Ethical Fallibilist.David Lee Stegall - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Georgia

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-13

Downloads
59 (#363,761)

6 months
13 (#264,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant.Allen W. Wood - 2004 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities.David Held - 2010 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
What is cosmopolitan?Jeremy Waldron - 2000 - Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2):227–243.

View all 17 references / Add more references