A Diferença como Revelação na Obra de Egon Schiele e Robert Musil

Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (36):55-66 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay is an attempt to show the different ways in which Deleuze’s philosophy can help us to interpret art. The main ideas or philosophical standpoints I use to analyze the paintings of Egon Schiele and Robert Musil’s novel The Confusions of Young Törless are elaborated in the book he wrote with Felix Guattari, A Thousend Plateaus. In the end, however, the very interpretation of these works of art should shed a new light on the understanding of Deleuze’s thought.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A diferencça como revelaçao na obra de Egon Schiele.Katia Hay - 2010 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 36:55-66.
Wittgenstein: la consciencia del limite una conversacion con Carla Carmona.Edimar Inocencio Brigido - 2019 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 64 (3):e34911.
The Erotic Work of Art is Also Sacred.Sydni Zastre - 2019 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 10 (2).
Immanence and Deterritorialization.Stephan Günzel - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6:137-143.
Nomadography.Robert T. Tally Jr - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):15-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-24

Downloads
3 (#1,854,928)

6 months
3 (#1,486,845)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katia Hay
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references