Graded epistemic justification

Philosophical Studies 178 (6):1845-1858 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The adjective ‘is justified’ has all the hallmarks of a gradable adjective. But the relationship between gradable uses and straightforward predications of the form ‘x is justified’ has been underexplored by epistemologists. In this paper we undertake to do some ground clearing as a prelude to better understanding this relationship.

Other Versions

reprint Hawthorne, John; Logins, Arturs Https://Orcidorg (2021) "Graded epistemic justification". ():

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-14

Downloads
171 (#141,808)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Artūrs Logins
Université Laval
John Hawthorne
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Degrees of Epistemic Criticizability.Cameron Boult - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2):431-452.
Justification and gradability.Davide Fassio & Artūrs Logins - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (7):2051-2077.
Logical Disagreement.Frederik J. Andersen - 2024 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Epistemology and cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
What 'must' and 'can' must and can mean.Angelika Kratzer - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.

View all 19 references / Add more references