Objectifying the phenomenal in experimental psychology: Titchener and beyond

Philosophia Scientiae 19 (3):73-94 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the origins and legacy of Titchener’s notion of stimulus error in the experimental study of sensory experience. It places Titchener’s introspective methods into the intellectual world of early experimental psychology. It follows the subsequent development of perceptual experimentation primarily in the American literature, with notice to British and German studies as needed. Subsequent investigators transformed the specific notion of a “stimulus error” into experimental questions in which subjects’ attitudes toward their perceptual tasks became independent variables to be manipulated experimentally. Ultimately, these manipulations support a distinction between accessing phenomenal as opposed to cognitive aspects of subjects’ responses to perceived objects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Experimental Study of the "Stimulus Error.".S. W. Fernberger - 1921 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 4 (1):63.
Grouping based on phenomenal proximity.Irvin Rock & Leonard Brosgole - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):531.
Consciousness and Experimental Philosophy.Chad Gonnerman - 2018 - In Rocco J. Gennaro (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Consciousness. New York: Routledge. pp. 463-477.
The progress of introspection in America, 1896–1938.Kenton Kroker - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (1):77-108.
An investigation of variables in judgments of relative area.Harry Helson & William Bevan - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):335.
Does the basic color terms discussion su er from the stimulus error?Rolf Kuehni - 2007 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 7 (1-2):113-117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-02

Downloads
105 (#201,891)

6 months
15 (#204,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Hatfield
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Why the “stimulus-error” did not go away.M. Chirimuuta - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:33-42.
Wundt and “Higher Cognition”: Elements, Association, Apperception, and Experiment.Gary Hatfield - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (1):48-75.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Perception Of The Visual World.James J. Gibson - 1950 - Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
The intrinsic quality of experience.Gilbert Harman - 1990 - Philosophical Perspectives 4:31-52.
Psychology as the behaviorist views it.John B. Watson - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (2):248-253.
An outline of psychology.E. B. Titchener - 1897 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 44:99-102.

View all 8 references / Add more references