Who’s right about rights?

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (3):209-212 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My comment on Jim Sterba’s bookFootnote1 will consist in a critique of what I take to be the central argument of the book, an argument that a certain kind of evil that is prevalent in our world is logically inconsistent with the existence of a good God. For our purposes here, the argument can be summarized briefly; if my objection as given here succeeds, the entire argument will fail to establish its conclusion. It begins with a statement of an alleged moral principle, then makes some assertions and draws a conclusion based on that principle. This principle is the Moral Evil Prevention Requirement 1.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Organic Unities.Graham Floyd - 2019 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 3 (2).
Hume e o problema do mal.Michael Tooley - 2015 - In Filosofia da Religiao. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Paulinas. pp. 197–229.
The Persistent Problem of Evil.Bruce Russell - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):121-139.
Analyzing Sterba’s argument.Michael Tooley - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (3):217-222.
Skeptical theism is incompatible with theodicy.Scott Coley - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (1):53-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-26

Downloads
76 (#285,436)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Hasker
Huntington University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references