Getting That Model T Back On the Road

Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):172-176 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Flint claims that an argument of his seriously damages “Model T,” a mereological model of the incarnation. I contend that the argument fails, and that Model T remains viable.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Model T Rattle-Free?Thomas P. Flint - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):177-181.
Model companions of theories with an automorphism.Hirotaka Kikyo - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1215-1222.
Generic variations of models of T.Andreas Baudisch - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):1025-1038.
Freedom and the Necessity of the Present.Michael Rota - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (4):451-465.
On Freedom and Foreknowledge.Ted A. Warfield - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):255-259.
Expanding William Hasker's Transcendental Refutation of Determinism.Ibrahim Dagher - 2021 - Prometheus Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):15-21.
The Time-symmetric Gold Universe Reconsidered.Friedel Weinert - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (3):231-243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-04

Downloads
46 (#504,117)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Hasker
Huntington University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references