The understanding/acceptance principle: I Understand it, but don't accept it

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):677-678 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can the understanding/acceptance principle help us to decide between alternative normative theories? There is little evidence that this principle can successfully be applied; there are no strong normative statements in Stanovich & West's target article. There is also no evidence for success of rational norms when applied to real life decisions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advancing the rationality debate.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):701-717.
Norms, goals, and the study of thinking.Raymond S. Nickerson - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):261-262.
Assessing the rationality of lay social inference.Garth J. O. Fletcher - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):775-776.
Rational Internalism.Samuel Asarnow - 2016 - Ethics 127 (1):147-178.
Practical and Alethic Reasons: Part I.Paul Grice - 2001 - In H. Paul Grice (ed.), Aspects of reason. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#782,679)

6 months
12 (#311,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references