Spinoza on Space and Motion

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue for two main theses. The first is that Spinoza held that space was not an independently existing thing such as absolute space This creates a problem for his account of individuation. The second thesis is that he can solve this problem by appealing to another doctrine he accepted, that there is absolute motion. I conclude that Spinoza was among the first early modern figures to reject absolute space but accept absolute motion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Berkeley on true motion.Scott Harkema - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 105 (C):165-174.
Absolute Space and the Riddle of Rotation: Kant’s Response to Newton.Marius Stan - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 7:257-308.
Newton’s Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space.Ori Belkind - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):271 – 293.
Kant’s Early Theory of Motion.Marius Stan - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:29-61.
Leibniz on force and absolute motion.John T. Roberts - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Newton’s Bucket (Thought) Experiment.Maja Malec - 2019 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):125-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-14

Downloads
246 (#111,401)

6 months
187 (#20,050)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Harrop
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references