Backsliding

In Richard Mervyn Hare (ed.), Freedom and reason. Oxford,: Clarendon Press (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discusses an important objection to the view that moral judgements are prescriptive: the existence of cases in which people act in ways that they know to be wrong. The objection is that if moral judgements are prescriptive, it is impossible to accept a moral judgement and yet act contrary to it; therefore prescriptivism must be wrong. It is argued that cases of moral weakness do not constitute a counterexample to prescriptivism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
10 (#1,469,173)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The indifference argument.Nick Zangwill - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (1):91 - 124.
Akrasia and self-control.David Wall - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (1):69 – 78.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references