A philosophy of science for us today? A response to Fellows and Richardson

Philosophical Studies 174 (7):1829-1838 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This manuscript identifies several important issues for philosophy of science at this moment in history raised in Fellows’ and Richardson’s generous comments. It also notes a couple of their assumptions that are problematic for this author, and tries to restate more clearly relevant arguments developed in Objectivity and Diversity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of Sandra Harding's Objectivity and Diversity. [REVIEW]María G. Navarro & Kamili Posey - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (4):60-64.
A Principled Standpoint: A Reply to Sandra Harding.María G. Navarro - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8:17-23.
Reply to critics.John Greco - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 53 (3):83-91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-10

Downloads
27 (#827,827)

6 months
6 (#866,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?