A Moral Argument for Substance Dualism

Journal of the American Philosophical Association (1):21--35 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents a moral argument in support of the view that the mind is a nonphysical object. It is intuitively obvious that we, the bearers of conscious experiences, have an inherent value that is not reducible to the value of our conscious experiences. It remains intuitively obvious that we have inherent value even when we represent ourselves to have no physical bodies whatsoever. Given certain assumptions about morality and moral intuitions, this implies that the bearers of conscious experiences—the objects possessing inherent value—are not physical objects. This moral evidence is corroborated by introspective evidence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

How valuable could a material object be?Andrew M. Bailey & Joshua Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2):332-343.
Direct Moral Standing and Regan's Lifeboat Cases.Daniel Austin Kary - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Calgary
Wittgenstein and the Metaphysics of Ethical Value.Julian Friedland - 2006 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 5 (1):91-102.
Genetic engineering and the dignity of creatures.Robert Heeger - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):43-51.
3. Inherent Value and Moral Standing in Environmental Change.Wendy Donner - 2018 - In . Cornell University Press. pp. 52-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-20

Downloads
1,970 (#6,735)

6 months
222 (#12,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerald K. Harrison
Massey University

Citations of this work

Generic Animalism.Andrew M. Bailey & Peter van Elswyk - 2021 - Journal of Philosophy 118 (8):405-429.
Our animal interests.Andrew M. Bailey - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2315-2328.
How Valuable Could a Person Be?Joshua Rasmussen & Andrew M. Bailey - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):264-277.
Two solutions to the neural discernment problem.Bradford Saad - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (10):2837-2850.
How valuable could a material object be?Andrew M. Bailey & Joshua Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2):332-343.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael R. Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

View all 28 references / Add more references