The religious stance

The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (50):60-61 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How we share the world, what conceptual framework might allow us to grasp the sharing, once the bleak world-in-itself is unavailable and all we have are our personalised worlds, remains a total mystery. Science can get along quite well without solving it, but cosmologists need to take it seriously. For philosophers, however, that the world we take for granted is a conceptual mess poses a problem

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Don’t mention it.Alastair Hannay - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 44:69-73.
Taking the BS out of The Big Society.Jesse Norman - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 55 (55):120-126.
Davidson's Epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 2003 - In Kirk Ludwig (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Donald Davidson. Cambridge University Press.
How Could We Rescue the World Today?Luce Irigaray - 2020 - Environmental Philosophy 17 (1):93-100.
More than a feeling.Andrew Terjesen - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 46 (46):95-98.
Seizing power from the divine.Nicholas Rescher - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 44 (44):74-75.
The wisdom of engineers.Natasha McCarthy - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 41 (41):38-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
56 (#384,347)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Alastair Hannay
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references