How not to defend science. A Decalogue for science defenders

Disputatio 9 (13) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The public defence of science has never been more important than now. However, it is a difficult task with many pitfalls, and there are mechanisms that can make it counterproductive. This article offers advice for science defenders, summarized in ten commandments that warn against potentially ineffective or even backfiring practices in the defence of science: Do not portray science as a unique type of knowledge. Do not underestimate scientific uncertainty. Do not describe science as infallible. Do not deny the value-ladenness of science. Do not associate with power. Do not blame the victims of disinformation. Do not aim at convincing the anti-scientific propagandists. Do not contribute to the legitimization of pseudoscience. Do not attack religion when it does not conflict with science. Do not call yourself a “sceptic”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science.William F. Brewer & Punyashloke Mishra - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 744–749.
Making Scientific Discoveries: Interdisciplinary Reflections.Jan G. Michel (ed.) - 2021 - Paderborn, Deutschland: Brill/mentis.
Has Feminism Changed Science?Londa L. Schiebinger - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Do We Need a Second-Order Science?M. A. Notturno - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):23-26.
“Do We Need a Scientific Revolution.Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Pseudoscience Charges and the Demarcation Problem.Moreno Paulon - 2023 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 11 (2):3-31.
Morality and Cognitive Science.Regina A. Rini - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-15

Downloads
6 (#1,697,385)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sven Ove Hansson
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Citations of this work

Facts and objectivity in science.Philippe Stamenkovic - 2023 - Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (2):277-298.
A Contextualist Solution to the Demarcation Problem.Olivier Sartenaer - 2024 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 55 (3).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references