Ethicism, interpretation, and munich

Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):71-87 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

abstract The paper, using Spielberg's Munich as a test case, argues that the theory of ethicism – the view that a work of art's moral point of view affects the work's overall aesthetic evaluation – has serious restricted applicability owing to a number of reasons. Ethicism does not apply to works of art (1) that have no moral content; (2) that do have moral content but whose prescribed responses are non-moral; (3) whose prescribed moral responses do not ask the audience to accept or reject the moral claim but merely to contemplate or entertain it; (4) whose prescribed moral responses assert moral claims that are indeterminate; and (5) whose prescribed moral responses are embodied in equally plausible or true but incompatible interpretations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#550,596)

6 months
5 (#1,059,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raja Halwani
School of the Art Institute of Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references