Ultimate Educational Aims, Overridingness, and Personal Well-being

Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (6):543-556 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discussion regarding education’s aims, especially its ultimate aims, is a key topic in the philosophy of education. These aims or values play a pivotal role in regulating and structuring moral and other types of normative education. We outline two plausible strategies to identify and justify education’s ultimate aims. The first associates these aims with a normative standpoint, such as the moral, prudential, or aesthetic, which is overriding, in a sense of ‘overriding’ to be explained. The second associates education’s ultimate aims with the intrinsic value of personal well-being. We advance reasons to doubt that these strategies are successful. The shortcomings of these strategies impute yet further urgency to the issue of how we are to ascertain and validate education’s ultimate aims

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-19

Downloads
78 (#267,786)

6 months
10 (#398,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ishtiyaque Haji
University of Calgary

Citations of this work

A Deweyan Critique of the Critical Thinking versus Character Education Debate.Guy Axtell - 2024 - Philosophical Inquiry in Education 31 (2):140-154.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Moral saints.Susan Wolf - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (8):419-439.

View all 31 references / Add more references