Animal rights and self-defense theory

Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (2):165-177 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I bring together self-defense theory and animal rights theory. The extension of self-defense theory to animals poses a serious problem for proponents of animal rights. If, in line with orthodox self-defense theory, a person is a legitimate target for third-party self-defensive violence if they are responsible for a morally unjustified harm without an acceptable excuse; and if, in line with animal rights theory, people that consume animal products are responsible for unjustified harm to animals, then many millions, if not billions, of otherwise law abiding and decent people will be legitimate targets for third-party self-defense violence on behalf of animals. I call this problem: the multiple inappropriate targets problem for animal rights.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-18

Downloads
288 (#99,721)

6 months
15 (#198,588)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Hadley
Western Sydney University

Citations of this work

Eco-sabotage as Defensive Activism.Dylan Manson - 2024 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 27 (4).
Animal Rights Pacifism.Blake Hereth - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):4053-4082.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references