Optimizing the Use of Digitization Technologies in Museums

Abstract

Digital technologies are used mostly for artifact preservation, but they can also be used for educating people about those artifacts in a museum context. This paper investigates the way various age groups react differently to distinct kinds of digitization technology. By using different technologies with certain age groups, adolescents can learn more from the artifacts or objects they are interacting with. This project aims to explore which technologies work with what age group in order to optimize adolescent education and artifact accessibility in museums. Accessibility for this study is defined as a museum making their collections available to a variety of people through digitization, whether online or in an exhibit. To explore the notion that separate age groups react differently to various digital technologies, I considered adolescents as three distinct age groups: six- to eight-years-old, nine- to eleven-years-old, and twelve- to fourteen-years-old. I then created a digital exhibit comprised of digital scans of four artifacts from the Ancient Mediterranean Cultures and Archaeology (AMCA) Lab of Butler University. This digital exhibit can be used with the three groups in future outreach programming. The primary technology being tested is photogrammetry. A review of 3D printing and virtual reality are also included. The results indicate that all groups can benefit from the use of these technologies, but that certain technologies would have a greater impact on specific age groups over others with varying levels of flexibility. For instance, the oldest age group, 12-14, could learn from looking at a 3D printed scan, but they might engage with a virtual environment better. However, the youngest age group, 6-8, would learn well from a 3D-printed model, but they might struggle in a virtual environment. It is also important to note that these technologies would allow for greater learning among other groups besides adolescents and could help increase any visitor’s experience in a museum.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,507

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Do Animals Have Technologies?Galit Wellner - 2017 - Studia Phaenomenologica 17:265-282.
Digital hermeneutics for the new age of cinema.Stacey O. Irwin - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (6):2207-2215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references