Convivial Gardens: Genesis 2–3 in Agrarian and Space-Critical Perspective

Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 77 (1):18-32 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Genesis 2–3 is among the most beloved yet misunderstood texts in the Hebrew Bible. Many biblical and post-biblical interpretations focus on themes of sin, death, and God’s banishment of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. These have fostered misapprehensions regarding the value of God’s creation and the dangerous image of an “Old Testament God of wrath.” This essay uses space-critical analysis to focus on the spaces of Eden—from ground to bodies to gardens—to show that Ivan Illich’s notion of “conviviality” best captures Eden’s true ethic of cooperation, environmental caretaking, and the positive portrait a gentle God who makes humans by hand.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Fall Paradox.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Philosophy and Theology 19 (1-2):3-5.
Escaping Eden : plant ethics in a gardener's world.Matthew Hall - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff & Dan O'Brien (eds.), Gardening - Philosophy for Everyone: Cultivating Wisdom. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 38–47.
Christian ecotheology and the old testament.Susan Power Bratton - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (3):195-209.
Human origins and the bible.John H. Walton - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):875-889.
Biblical Gardens in Word Culture: Genesis and History.Zofia Włodarczyk & Anna Kapczyńska - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5):835-854.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-27

Downloads
4 (#1,804,835)

6 months
3 (#1,475,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references