Vergelt’s Gott?

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 96 (2):250-257 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social work has much professionalised within the last decades. What once was Samaritan charity or the housewife’s duty, has become a major economic factor in the western world. The author treats two questions: a) what differentiates social from economic work, and b) how can a just reward for social work be taxed? Starting with the parable of the Samaritan, it is argued that social work is not productive at all, but consumtive. Since there is no yield, at first sight no wage is justified. Social work has no economic, but only moral ends. And morality is no matter of exchange (Kant). The solution the author proposes is threefold: 1) Since the social worker passes his chance for economic income when healing (social) wounds, he shall be compensated (in the range of A. Smith’s limit of wages); 2) For social work is some sort of social internal labour, it should be freed of all taxes and dues; 3) Jobs in the economy shall be opened to social professionals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,170

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
6 (#1,748,041)

6 months
1 (#1,607,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references