- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Commentary: Philosophers at the Bar—Some Reasons for Restraint
Science, Technology, and Human Values 8 (4):30-38 (1983)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Commentary: Science at the Bar-Causes for Concern.Larry Laudan - 1982 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 7 (41):16-19.
Commentary: Some Perspectives in Contemporary Sociology of Science.Sal Restivo - 1981 - Science, Technology and Human Values 6 (2):22-30.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-27
Downloads
6 (#1,695,458)
6 months
3 (#1,471,455)
2020-11-27
Downloads
6 (#1,695,458)
6 months
3 (#1,471,455)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
Matters of demarcation: Philosophy, biology, and the evolving fraternity between disciplines.Andrew S. Yang - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):211 – 225.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-fcc9b7db9-csx9g uwo