Soft Logic: The Epistemic Role of Aesthetic Criteria

Upa (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Soft Logic is a fascinating study that links scientific and mathematical reasoning to literature and the arts. In this work, Joseph Grünfeld argues that justification by resemblance is more common in science than is generally recognized. That is, symbolic and metaphorical modes of thinking, which are largely analogical, often play a significant role in the interpretation of formal systems. Noting that twentieth century non-Aristotelian forms of reasoning have greatly expanded our understanding of what constitutes logic, Grünfeld explores a wide range of relevant topics, including reasonableness, metaphor, deconstruction, postmodernism, aesthetics, art, and philosophy. In the process, he identifies the postmodernist implications of modern logic and develops how they may be applied to both science and art. Scholars of philosophy, aesthetics, and art will find this comprehensive and insightful work thought provoking

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Soft Logic. The Epistemic Role of Aesthetic Criteria.Joseph Grünfeld - 2004 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 194 (1):137-138.
Soft logic: The epistemic role of aesthetic criteria.Paul Humble - 2001 - British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2):236-238.
Grünfeld . - Science And Values. [REVIEW]P. Dubois - 1975 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 165:71.
Grünfeld . - Method and language. [REVIEW]J. Gabaude - 1983 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173:357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
14 (#1,289,943)

6 months
3 (#1,491,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Recent work on aesthetics of science.James W. McAllister - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):7 – 11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references