Is the method of bold conjectures and attempted refutations justifiably the method of science?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):105-136 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
223 (#114,229)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adolf Grunbaum
Last affiliation: University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Ad hoc auxiliary hypotheses and falsificationism.Adolf Grünbaum - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):329-362.
Resurrecting logical probability.James Franklin - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (2):277-305.
Karl Popper.Stephen Thornton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Tale of Three Theories: Feyerabend and Popper on Progress and the Aim of Science.Luca Tambolo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:33-41.
The Problem of Unconceived Objections.Moti Mizrahi - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):425-436.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
The Foundations of Scientific Inference.Wesley C. Salmon - 1967 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Pre.

View all 18 references / Add more references