Simple Minds: A Cognitive Account of Theoretical Simplicity and the Epistemology of Human Understanding

Dissertation, The University of Arizona (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why should anybody care about theoretical simplicity? It is pretty clear that simpler theories don't stand a better chance of being true, just because they are simpler than their competitors. Of course, simpler theories are easier to use in technological applications, and they are more tractable. But that is something engineers should be concerned about. Why should the theoretical scientist be interested in simple theories? ;The principal virtue of simple theories is their facilitation of scientific understanding in virtue of their greater explanatory power. Simple theories are more unified, and they allow important kinds of reasoning about the world. If a theory yields a unified but structure-rich picture of the world, and thereby a high degree of understanding, we can design relevant experiments, form rational expectations, and in general are in a better position to gather relevant data than when we confront the world without any understanding whatsoever. Simple theories are therefore, in virtue of increasing our understanding, epistemically advantageous. That's why the theoretical scientist should be interested in simple theories. ;Of course, since the choice of simple theories does not guarantee getting closer to the truth, the claim that such a choice is epistemically advantageous presupposes that we draw a distinction between the explanatory power of theories and their accuracy. This distinction has not received sufficient attention in the existing literature, and that's why it was so difficult to say exactly what the virtue of simple theories is. Recognizing that explanatory power and accuracy are orthogonal aspects of scientific theories allows us to assign simplicity the role of facilitating understanding and thereby guiding controlled experimentation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Some Aspects of Simplicity.Chamu Namasivayam - 1990 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
Simplicity.Nicholas Maxwell - 2000 - Philsci Archive.
n-Simple theories.Alexei S. Kolesnikov - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 131 (1-3):227-261.
Hume on Theoretical Simplicity.Hsueh Qu - 2023 - Philosophers' Imprint 23 (1).
Bayesianism and Simplicity.Ben Escoto - 2004 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Underdetermination and Scientific Realism.Jalal Abdollahi & Javad Akbari Takhtameshlou - 2021 - Philosophical Investigations 15 (34):224-247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
1 (#1,950,362)

6 months
1 (#1,810,373)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franz-Peter Griesmaier
University of Wyoming

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references