If-Clauses and Probability Operators

Topoi 30 (1):17-29 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Adams’ thesis is generally agreed to be linguistically compelling for simple conditionals with factual antecedent and consequent. We propose a derivation of Adams’ thesis from the Lewis- Kratzer analysis of if-clauses as domain restrictors, applied to probability operators. We argue that Lewis’s triviality result may be seen as a result of inexpressibility of the kind familiar in generalized quantifier theory. Some implications of the Lewis- Kratzer analysis are presented concerning the assignment of probabilities to compounds of conditionals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,190

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
564 (#51,709)

6 months
13 (#196,418)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mikael Cozic
Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University
Paul Egré
École Normale Supérieure

References found in this work

Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.
On conditionals.Dorothy Edgington - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):235-329.
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.Jon Barwise - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159.

View all 35 references / Add more references