Universal Emergency Access under Managed Care: Universal Doubt or Mission Impossible?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):213-225 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Appropriate concerns about cost and unequal access to healthcare have resulted in the creation of powerful managed networks seeking to share the risks of high healthcare costs among plans, providers, and patients. Much to their credit, these managed networks have slowed the rise in healthcare spending by as much as 44% in markets with high HMO penetration. However, whether these savings will materially improve access and quality remains to be seen

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Universal Access on the American Commons.Joseph C. D'Oronzio - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (4):627.
A Jewish Perspective on Access to Healthcare.Noam J. Zohar - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):260-265.
Managed Care, Cost Control, and the Common Good.John J. Paris & Stephen G. Post - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (2):182-188.
Will Social Values Influence the Development of HMOs?John B. Davis - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):418-421.
An Analysis of Factors Underlying E-Health Disparities.Cynthia Baur - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (4):417-428.
Putting Universal Healthcare on the Religious Agenda.Daniel A. Moros & Rosamond Rhodes - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):233-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
55 (#387,113)

6 months
12 (#277,123)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references