The failure of traditional arguments in the vivisection debate

Public Affairs Quarterly 14 (2):159-182 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does Vivisection Pass the Utiliatrian Test?Stephen R. Kaufman - 1995 - Public Affairs Quarterly 9 (2):127-137.
Religious arguments and the.Duty Of Civility - 2001 - Public Affairs Quarterly 15 (2):133.
On moral arguments against.A. Legal Right To Unilateral - 2006 - Public Affairs Quarterly 20 (2):115.
Religious Arguments and the Duty of Civility.Samuel C. Rickless - 2001 - Public Affairs Quarterly 15:133-154.
Paid Surrogacy: Arguments and Responses.Heidi Malm - 1989 - Public Affairs Quarterly 3 (2):57-66.
A Critical Look at Arguments for Food Irradiation.Tony Smith - 1989 - Public Affairs Quarterly 3 (4):15-25.
Euthanasia, Capital Punishment and Mistakes-Are-Fatal Arguments.Douglas K. Blount - 1996 - Public Affairs Quarterly 10 (4):279-290.
Four arguments against political obligations from gratitude.George Klosko - 1991 - Public Affairs Quarterly 5 (1):33-48.
Merit Badgering: Dissecting a Slippery Concept in the Affirmative Action Debate.Timothy J. Lukes & Bonnie G. Campodonico - 1996 - Public Affairs Quarterly 10 (3):219-227.
On Moral Arguments against a Legal Right to Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention.David Lefkowitz - 2006 - Public Affairs Quarterly 20 (2):115-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-19

Downloads
31 (#718,157)

6 months
6 (#825,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references