Concept learning and nonmonotonic reasoning

In Henri Cohen & Claire Lefebvre (eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (Second Edition). pp. 977-999 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Humans learn new concepts extremely fast. One or two examples of a new concept are often sufficient for us to grasp its meaning. Traditional theories of concept formation, such as symbolic or connectionist representations, have problems explaining the quick learning exhibited by humans. In contrast to these representations, I advocate a third form of representing categories, which employs geometric structures. I argue that this form is appropriate for modeling concept learning. By using the geometric structures of what I call “conceptual spaces,” I define properties and concepts. A learning model that shows how properties and concepts can be learned in a simple but naturalistic way is then presented. This model accounts well for the role of similarity judgments in concept learning. Finally, as an application, the concept representations are used to give an analysis of nonmonotonic reasoning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-13

Downloads
18 (#1,125,631)

6 months
3 (#1,491,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Gärdenfors
Lund University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references