The Metaethics of Paul Tillich

Journal of Religious Ethics 1:113-133 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tillich holds an ontologically based self-realization theory of ethics. For him ethics is neither logically nor linguistically tied to theology, but is in a certain sense epistemologically dependent. Tillich's material analysis of moral judgments is claimed to be inconsistent with his critique of heteronomous morality. The author concludes that Tillich has not given good reasons for rejecting a heteronomous divine - command theory of morality

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Metaethics of Paul Tillich: Further Reflections.Terence M. O'Keeffe - 1982 - Journal of Religious Ethics 10 (1):135 - 143.
A Critique of Graber's Divine Command Theory of Ethics.[author unknown] - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (1):157-163.
A Critique of Graber's Divine Command Theory of Ethics.John P. Reeder Jr - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (1):157 - 163.
Critique and Formation: Paul Tillich’s Interpretation of Protestantism.Christian Danz - 2018 - International Yearbook for Tillich Research 13 (1):237-244.
Reflection and Doubt in the Thought of Paul Tillich. [REVIEW]F. H. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):368-368.
Paul Tillich and Photography.Bo-Myung Seo - 2024 - European Journal of Theology and Philosophy 4 (3):10-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
18 (#1,128,506)

6 months
4 (#1,288,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Glenn Graber
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

Theonomous Business Ethics.Payman Tajalli - 2020 - Philosophy of Management 20 (1):57-73.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references