Residual Cognitive Capacities in Patients With Cognitive Motor Dissociation, and Their Implications for Well-Being

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (6):729-757 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Patients with severe disorders of consciousness are thought to be unaware of themselves or their environment. However, research suggests that a minority of patients diagnosed as having a disorder of consciousness remain aware. These patients, designated as having “cognitive motor dissociation”, can demonstrate awareness by imagining specific tasks, which generates brain activity detectable via functional neuroimaging. The discovery of consciousness in these patients raises difficult questions about their well-being, and it has been argued that it would be better for these patients if they were allowed to die. Conversely, I argue that CMD patients may have a much higher level of well-being than is generally acknowledged. It is far from clear that their lives are not worth living, because there are still significant gaps in our understanding of how these patients experience the world. I attempt to fill these gaps, by analyzing the neuroscientific research that has taken place with these patients to date. Having generated as comprehensive a picture as possible of the capacities of CMD patients, I examine this picture through the lens of traditional philosophical theories of well-being. I conclude that the presumption that CMD patients do not have lives worth living is not adequately supported.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When Does Consciousness Matter? Lessons from the Minimally Conscious State.Joseph Vukov - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (1):5-15.
Well-Being After Severe Brain Injury: What Counts as Good Recovery?Mackenzie Graham & Lorina Naci - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4):613-622.
Ethically Optimal Interventions with Impaired Patients.Edmund G. Howe - 2014 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (1):3-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-06

Downloads
29 (#839,596)

6 months
7 (#573,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mackenzie Graham
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Well-Being and Health.Richard Kim & Daniel M. Haybron - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (6):645-655.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Achievement.Gwen Bradford - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references