Marbury Versus Madison: Documents and Commentary

&
CQ Press (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Combines documents and analytical essays timed for the bicentennial in 2003. It explains the constitutional, political, philosophical background to judicial review, the historical record leading to this landmark case and the impact of the decision since 1803.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1568027192

Other Versions

No versions found

View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Marbury V Madison: An analysis.Margaret R. L. L. Kelly - manuscript
Madison on the "general Welfare" of America: His Consistent Constitutional Vision.Leonard R. Sorenson - 1995 - University Press of Amer.
Slavný případ Marbury vs. Madison aktuální i po dvou stoletích.Marek Antoš - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1).
Sui generis? The hybrid israeli constitutional experience.Rivka Weill - unknown
Judicial Activism or Self-Restraint : Some Insight Into the Indonesian Constitutional Court.Radian Salman, Sukardi Sukardi & Mohammad Syaiful Aris - 2018 - Yuridika 33 (1):145-170.
«Razao e Liberdade. A Filosofia Politica de James Madison» Arguicao e Resposta.Alessandra Silveira & José Gomes André - 2011 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (37):217-240.
Constitutional democracy and the legitimacy of judicial review.Samuel Freeman - 1990 - Law and Philosophy 9 (4):327 - 370.
Las reformas constitucionales en México, como objeto de la acción de inconstitucionalidad.Elva Rizo Magaña - 2007 - Ratio Juris 1 (2):83-94.
A loss of innocence?: judicial independence and the separation of powers.R. Stevens - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (3):365-402.
Clarifying departmentalism: How the framers' vision of judicial and presidential review makes the case for deductive judicial supremacy.David W. Tyler - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-13

Downloads
8 (#1,588,140)

6 months
2 (#1,694,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references